Invisible from the outside
Every tool runs under unique constraints. Productivity dips stay hidden in aggregate statistics — buried under the noise of standard reporting.
Solution · Semiconductor
A complete framework — from the productivity loss hidden inside today's tools to a learned scheduler running in production.
The Problem
High-performance tools rarely run at their full physical potential. The bottleneck isn't the hardware — it's the schedule inside the tool.
Every tool runs under unique constraints. Productivity dips stay hidden in aggregate statistics — buried under the noise of standard reporting.
Inefficient sequencing inside the tool creates repeated wait states and idle chambers that quietly erode throughput, hour after hour.
The scheduling space is too complex for humans. Rule-based heuristics cannot capture the full potential and degrade as recipes evolve.
Manufacturers already hire teams of engineers to chase productivity tool by tool. Coverage stays partial; the long tail of losses persists.
Why it's so hard
Intra-tool scheduling combines recipes, chamber states, and wafer priorities into an NP-hard space with no analytic optimum. Sub-second decisions must adapt to constant recipe variability — far beyond what handcrafted rules can keep up with.
Schedule A
78%
Looks fine
Schedule B
99%
Actually optimal
The Solution
Chronoboost combines a digital-twin simulator with reinforcement-learning agents to discover the schedule that pushes each tool to its physical optimum.
Each tool is replicated as a high-fidelity digital twin — chambers, robots, recipes, and constraints — ready for AI simulation.
Millions of simulated runs train an optimal scheduling policy. The agent learns context-aware decisions no rulebook could encode.
The trained model issues sub-second scheduling decisions in production — fully automated, continuously refined from operational data.
The Results
In our in-house digital-twin simulator, the AI agent converges rapidly toward the theoretical maximum throughput of each tool — with no changes to recipes or process steps.
3 hours of training
Initial agent — learning the basics
32% of optimum
1 day of training
Rapid convergence on strong policies
80% of optimum
3 days of training
Near-optimal scheduling productivity
99% of optimum
The same approach generalizes to live equipment: each tool's digital twin trains a dedicated policy that captures its specific physical constraints, recipe mix, and operating context.
The Benefits
A software layer that maximizes the output of every tool already on the floor, with deployment characteristics designed for production fabs.
Tools with significant scheduling-loss potential see real, measurable improvements without any change to recipes or hardware.
No process change, no recipe change, no hardware modification. Productivity gains land without yield risk.
Know the physical optimum of every tool. Replace ambiguous productivity targets with data-grounded baselines.
Productivity analysis and improvement become algorithm-driven — covering every tool without scaling the engineering team linearly.
Performance compounds over time. The longer the system runs, the more operational data refines the scheduling policy.
Works on equipment already on the floor. Pilot to measurable gain in a relatively short window — no fab build required.
We'll walk through a deployment plan tailored to your tools and operating context.
Request a Demo